Thursday, August 11, 2011

Two tiered test cricket?

Zimbabwe's return to test cricket was very impressive. Match was very competitive with both teams having good chance to win till 4th day. Two were almost evenly matched teams. Agreed that current England- India series is more one sided, but India had their chances and teams were more or less well matched on paper. Such matches are much more fun that one sided matches between top test teams and the cellar-dwellers like Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. With new football season about to begin this weekend, I wonder if similar structure could be applied to cricket as well to have more competitive matches and continued interest in test cricket. Two-tiered test cricket with promotion/ relegation could be the answer.

With 10 test teams, we can have 6 teams in top tier, viz., India, England, Australia, Sri Lanka, South Africa and Pakistan. And the rest, i.e., West Indies, New Zealand, Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, in 2nd tier. ICC is already proposing Test Championship. So why not have it among top 6 teams? And another tournament among second tier. (What prompted me to divide teams in these groups? I guess it's quite obvious. Zimbabwe are playing their next test against New Zealand, so this proves pedigree of the teams)

It would be run over 2 year period. During this period each team will play other team in test series (minimum 3 tests), either home or away. If one team plays at home against particular team, it plays away against same team in next tournament. Test series win would fetch 3 points and 1 for drawn series. Or we can have test wise scoring system as well. So at the end of 3 years the team with maximum points wins. No more complex calculations to decide world champion. After each tournament team at the bottom of the group relegates and team topping second tier would be promoted. So teams which are not good enough from top tier would automatically get relegated and teams like say New Zealand would get promoted.

So when would teams like New Zealand play against say India or Australia in that 2 year period? For that there could be knock-out tournament like FA Cup, which could run annually or biennially. 2 winners of knock-out matches in 2nd tier would join 6 teams in quarter finals. This would be based on random draws and so West Indies could be drawn against say England. This would be followed by Semis and Finals. Now this could be 2 or 3 test series. Effectively this gives even Bangladesh to compete and play with top teams in Semis and Finals provided they are good enough.

So in 2 year period, a test team would be playing 5 test series for the Championship and 2-3 test series for the Cup. Overall 7-8 test series in 2 year period, which is in sync with current schedules. But these series would be more competitive and should produce better cricket with everything to play for!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Fans & sports teams

Takeover saga at Liverpool is over, but their on-the-field performance remains the same. Mired into relegation, avoiding bottom of the league just by goal difference. Fans have not only passionately followed the events both on and off the field, but also tried to influence the proceedings by protests, campaigns n all. That's how fans all over the world follow their teams, especially in football.

Now consider another news over the last week. 2 franchises dropped from IPL, Rajasthan & Punjab! It was any-ways a disputed decision, showing how whimsical BCCI n IPL authorities are. But 'fans' of these franchises have been conspicuously absent from these events. The very people who pack stadiums during IPL are not at all bothered about fate of their city-teams.

This again shows how flimsy the fan-following for IPL is. Of course, it is great source of entertainment and that's what it is. Only entertainment. Football clubs are part of the social milieu, communities associate with them. That's why fate of Liverpool football club binds all people of Liverpool. 40000 people flock Ellan Road even when Leeds are in League 1. It's because people associate with the club. Sadly IPL still hasn't developed such passions. I hope in India, there would be such sport culture one day, but I don't see IPL being solution for that. To have such passions, you need bottom up approach!

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Sports & subcontinent

Last 2 weeks have been amazing for sport lovers in India. Commonwealth games and India-Australia Test series. Both provided enthralling contest and tight finishes. I really enjoyed see-saw battle for 2nd place in medals table between India & England. Hope some of this success translates into Olympic medals.

Talking about medals table, bbc provided two interesting tables along with normal table. It showed population per medal & GDP per medal. India of course was very much at the bottom in both these tables, in spite of healthy medals tally and it was expected. We always lament about India's inability to get medals in spite of huge population. (Indian story has always been about volumes game n never per capita, especially in economy. But that's different story.)

So coming back to the medals table by population & GDP, 4 out of bottom 5 countries in both tables are India, Bangladesh, Pakistan & Sri Lanka. All south asian countries. Bangladesh is at bottom in both these tables with just 1 bronze medal with population of 160 million, 1/6th of India. Still they have managed just 1 bronze. Pakistan another country from subcontinent has won 5 medals, with 2 golds. What's the thing with south asian countries that they are unable to win medals in sporting competition? They are richer than African countries which regularly win medals, if that is an excuse. They are physically similar to Chinese, Koreans if physique is to be excuse. So where lies the problem? Is it just that sport is not part of culture in subcontinent? Question to ponder about!

Labels: , ,

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Singapore & Mumbai

I am not history expert, but recently I read about history of Singapore and i thought of uncanny similarities between Singapore & Mumbai.

Singapore gained independence from Malaysia in 1965. Since then it has grown from a developing nation to a developed one. In fact, I remember reading somewhere that by 1950, Calcutta, Singapore and Rangoon, all located quite close by were at same economic level. But in next 60 years, Singapore has become develped, Calcutta has been on decline, while Rangoon has been lost into oblivion ubder military junta. Pardon me for degression, but that's not point of this blog.

When Singapore & Malaysia became independent from British rule, Malaysian confederation was formed. Under new constitution, ethnic Malays were given special previleges. Now, Singapore was a trading city dominated by Chinese, who controlled business. They thought that this would undermine their role and opposed such affirmative policies. The disagreements resulted in racial riots and Singapore separated from Malaysia to become independent country. Business community in Singapore had triumphed.

Consider similar period in Mumbai. Late 50s! Mumbai was a port, whose business was dominated by Gujaratis, Parsis, Marwaris. When Maharastra state was formed, there was lot of debate over Mumbai's inclusion in Maharastra. Business communities were in favour of keeping it as a separate state (not country like Singapore though). There were agitations by Marathi people for its inclusion in Maharashtra. And finally it was made capital of Maharashtra.

Two cities, similar issues, different outcomes. Singapore separated, while Mumbai remained part of Maharashtra!

What would have happened if the outcomes had been different, is matter of 'ifs and buts'. But state of two cities is here to see for every, though the growth of city is also dependent on other factors like political leadership, businesses in city. So I am not drawing any conclusions. Just highlighting the fact that, business communities have their own motives and they have strong influence on shaping futures of cities, even countries.

Few critical decisions decide the future path of cities and this could have been one of them!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Poland - nation caught in crossfire

Polish President and many top Polish officials died in aeroplane crash as their plane tried to land in thick fog. Really a tragic event! But this event has also helped to thaw the tense relations between Russia & Poland.

Polish president was going to attend anniversary of Katyn massacre (There is excellent movie on this by Andrej Wajda, renowned Polish director). In this massacre around 20000 Polish troops and intelligentsia were killed by Russian army. Russia confessed about this massacre in 1990 and prior to that it had claimed that it was done by Nazis.

Poland has always been caught in this crossfire of two mighty nations on either side. And so has been Hungary. Mighty Russia on one side and Germany (and more recently USA & allies) on the other (Wajda movie depicts this very well, where by citizens are caught on bridge with Russian & German armies invading from either side). During World Wars, these countries were used as pawns & soft targets and suffered the most. Cities were devastated, people had to migrate (even Able in 'Kane and Able' is Pole). During Cold War, they were part of Soviet block and were important part of Russian strategy against USA. After disintegration of Soviet Union, these countries tried to move away from Russia towards NATO block, resulting in ire from Russia. Thus, over the years Poland and Hungary been caught in the crossfire.

But recent events have helped to improve relations between Poland and Russia. Medvedev addressed Polish people and showed empathy towards them. Even Putin's reaction has been positive. Such improved relations with West & Russia would definitely help Poland. It could benefit from its unique location. Lot of investment from Western Europe, especially Germany, has gone in Poland and further Russian investments would definitely help. So rather than being a nation caught in crossfire, it could serve as a nation which bridges West & Russia!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Afrikaners!

Eugene Terreblanche, leader of white supremacist movement, was murdered yesterday in South Africa creating potential for racial tensions in SA. He was an Afrikaner staying in mostly-white town in the interiors of South Africa. This murder could result in disruptions in South Africa in Football WC year.

Afrikaners have always considered themselves as part of South African history, as if they are natives over there. They are mainly descendants of Dutch immigrants who migrated to South Africa in 18th-19th century. Interestingly, they didn't try to colonise, unlike Europeans did in other parts of the world. They were mainly farmers (and hence called 'boers'- farmer in Afrikaan) and formed their small towns & republics in northern part of SA after British colonists pushed them inland. They fought with local African tribes like Zulus & Xhosas for land. Interestingly, Niall Ferguson in his book Empire, mentions Boers as last remaining tribe of Africa, after Zulus were defeated.

And still Afrikaners consider themselves as the rightful owners of SA land and in my opinion, their white supremacy movement, lead by Terreblanche in past, also stems from this. It's like any other separatist movement where people want separate country because they are ethnically/religiously/culturally different. Even they have in the past threatened 'Civil war', war between two groups of same country, if their demands are not met.

Interesting how some European immigrants went to totally different region and became a local 'tribe'!

Labels: , ,

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Hypocrasy of Gulf Countries

Israeli tennis player is denied visa to play in Dubai Open. Many tennis tournaments or for that matter many sporting & entertainment events are held in Middle East these days, in Qatar, UAE, Bahrain. Such events feature activities, which are not permitted in these counties, like drinking liquor, women wearing short skirts. I always wonder, how can country be so hypocrite- at one side allow such things as part of driving tourism & showing their 'modern' face to the world and on the other hand not allowing their own subjects the same freedom.

Agreed that Gulf countries are hypocrites, but how could countries of 'free' world then allow prominent events to happen in such countries? Why can't WTA or say leading women players take stance that they won't play in such countries, until women from these countries are not granted freedom? Are other countries too dependent on Gulf countries (or their oil), that they can't take such stance?

Labels: ,

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Smoke and Mirrors

Just finished an excellent book about China - Smoke and Mirrors by Pallavi Aiyer (daughter of ToI columnist Swaminathan Aiyer). The author was correspondent for Hindu and Indian Express in China from 2002 to 2007, and gives first hand account of China from Indian eyes. Book covers various issues in China ranging from the the political situation to food and religion. What I really liked about the book is, it gives balanced account of all issues.

What I wanted to write in this blog is not a review of the book, but rather about the dearth of such books or coverage of such articles in Indian media. Hardly ever do we get to read about the international news. Most of the news in newspapers are borrowed from international news agencies like Reuters and AP. And on TV, of course, one cannot expect news cum entertainment channels to cover such news, so one has to watch BBC or CNN. All these news sources are of excellent quality and especially BBC shows how good and diverse journalism could be.

But these sources mostly provide western point of view for news and thus results in view of the world through western eyes. So for articles on Indian point of view, the only source is newspapers like Indian Express and Hindu ( precisely two newspapers the author worked for). And there is no news channel (NDTV to a certain extent) which gives in depth coverage of news. Other media just resorts to pandering with sensationalising news(?). In short, Indian media, barring few exceptions mentioned, is useless for getting quality news.

Are Indian media houses not interested in sending correspondents outside India ( In the book, author has mentioned that in China there were only 3 Indian journalists based in China, compared to 10-15 from each European country) or is it that people don't like it?. Media instead promotes stuff which is no way related to their core job. e.g. Times has started Teach India Campaign. The objectives and the outcome of the campaign can be noble, but my views about Times Group are not particularly good, especially the kind of content they provide in their newspaper. What I feel is that such campaign are just to improve the image of the group, which has been sullied by their news quality. What happened to their previous hoopla, Lead India? It was nothing more than a PR exercise and nothing substantial came out of it.

It is high time that Indian media has to mature and focus on providing quality content rather than focusing on peripheral issues. We need more books and articles like Smoke and Mirror.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Ash - Abhishek Wedding and Media

Last few days most of the newschannels (esp. Hindi) were showing only one news. Shaadi of the year (or should I say decade, century...)!. Coverage on channels like Aaj Tak, Star News was simply ridiculous. They were telecasting as if it is the only news that Indians are interested in. Agreed it was a headline, but not worth the importance it received. Times of India, so called leading paper in Mumbai, alloted more than half of its first page for the news. Newspapers and news channels are giving up their responsibility of being 'The Fourth Pillar of Democracy" and are morphing into yet another medium of entertainment.

But I am amazed by a completely different aspect of Ash-Abhishek wedding. I am amazed by the amount of rituals and pujas performed before engagement and the amount of coverage it receieved. Aishwarya is maangalik and hence they performed a series of pujas at the Kashi Vishwanath temple and Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi. I find this simply ridiculous. We are leaving in modern age. Education must inculcate scientific attitude in learned and they do away with such ideas. Media and role models in society are supposed to create awareness among people to develope such rational mindset. On the contrary, Amitabh Bachchan, role model for many Indians, is performing such rituals and media is abating by giving it unnecessary coverage. Not a single newspaper or news channel raised this issue. On the contrary, they portaryed it as if it was one of the necessary events before the wedding.


Media has to play more active role in eradicating such irrational traditions and practices. Newspapers have, over the years, been successful in creating awareness among masses against such traditions. They must live upto that tradition.


PS: Just my father pointed out that maangalik issue was portrayed in right perspective in latest blockbuster 'Lage Raho Munnabahi'. And the irony is that Abhishek Bachchan is shown marrying to a maangalik girl against the wishes of his father and ctiticises such traditions. Time to replicate the Reel life into Real life!

Labels: ,

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Anti-terrorism campaign by Mumbai Police

Most around the world are concerned with the rising terrorism. And Governments are taking various measures to stop terrorism. However, the latest ad campaign by Mumbai Police to create public awareness about teroorism, fails to fulfil its objective.

In this campaign, various advertises (by Lintas. Since joining JB, I always pay attention to this kind of stuff!) are put up in buses, trains to make commuters aware that the next terrorist can be right next to you. Some of the posters go like this



  • The bag next to you may not belong to everyday commuter

  • Don't be ashamed to check below your seat

  • Don't look outside. Check the person next to you instead for any suspicious actions

I found these slogans really really ridiculous, especially the last one. I mean, you have boarded the bus and enjoying the scenery outside (though we don't get much of that in Mumbai), then suddenly you see this slogan. Does it mean that we should not enjoy life, instead look at each and every person around you with suspicion. This is India, a democracy, and not any dictatorial country. This kind of things used to happen in communist Russia, where every person used to spy each other. Isn't it the responsibility of the Police and Government to look after the safety of the citizens. Agreed that there must be some citizen awarenss, but it should not precede the basic right of the citizens' basic right to live.

This kind of thing creates paranoia among public, decreasing their confidence. But such things are becoming more and more pervasive around the world. People look after each other with suspicion, which is not the sign of healthy society.

Thus, this campaign is not serving its purpose. Advertising Agency is also to blame to an extent in my opinion. The message can be conveyed in more effective manner. Citizens can be made to participate actively without creating this paranoia.

Labels: ,

Friday, December 29, 2006

TV Technologies

I am thinking about swithing from Cable Tv to DTH or any other technology. But when I looked at the options, I was really disappointed.

Tata Sky and Dish TV project themselves in their advertisements as if they are panacea for all the cable problems. But in reality they are nothing but other form cable television. No service lets you chose single channels, you have to chose bouques. More so with Tata Sky, where there is single payment of Rs. 300 per month. In Dish, at least, you have a choise between 4-5 packages. And there are some more channels that are not available on normal cable like Goal TV which telecast SPL, Dutch League (Hurrah!). But otherwise its same old cable TV. There are some advantages like better picture quality and interactive services. But are they really worth, as you have to pay for unnecessary channels.
DTH should be more flexible. For example, on one of the Sundays, there were two Cricket matches going on on Star Sports and ESPN. So they didn't show football match. Really frustrating. Now, as ESPN-Star have rights for EPL and Cricket, they must provide user with choice to choose between sports. Even in case of Champions League matches, there must be option of chosing among 8 matches, just like they have on Sky Sports in UK. Otherwise DTH is useless.

From 1st January, Government will be implementing CAS in Metros. So user has to pay Rs.5 for each pay channel. System seems good as there is no bouquet system involved. But implementation is through cable operattor so it will be interesting to see how it turns out. Also setting up artificial limit of Rs.5 is also a contentious issue. Another technology, IPTV, is also in its initial stages and number of channels offered by MTNL is also limited.
The world is moving from normal DTH to DTH with HDTV and here we are still discussing whether to implement CAS or not. Ditto is the case with moble technology, where Japan and Korea are planning to move from 3G to 4G and Indian Governement plans to allot spectrums for 3G to Indian operators from March, 2008. Indian public maybe fast adapting to technology changes, but when there is a policy decision involved, there always seems to be lag because of Governement involvement.
Possible solution? Government officials should make all the technologies available to the public and let them decide the fate of the technology!

Labels: ,

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Looking beyond Googlemania!




"Don't be Evil"- The famous motto of Google, a company widely acknowledged and even revered across the globe. But recently there have been many instances where Google has behaved totally opposite to this motto. The self-imposed censorship in China being the most publicized one. But there are also other examples in which I get the feeling that Google is having the same influence on the Internet, as Microsoft had on OSs and PCs.

I just read in Business Standard that many of the newspaper editors are writing their headlines so that they become Google-friendly, irrespective of what the readers like. Isn't this like many softwares being compatible with Microsoft Windows to get the wider coverage?

Another thing I would like to mention is Google Talk. I mean, it's one of the worst messangers. It has no facility for conference, no Appear Offline, or even emoticons. And integrating GTalk with Gmail is the most irritating part. You are just visiting Gmail to mail and then Google notifies that you are online. No privacy! In spite of this it has become very popular with users( or should I put it - Its usage has increased). Some people (like my friend Gopal) find it better than Yahoo! This increase is mostly due to bundling of GTalk with Orkut, most popular social networking site. Didn't Microsoft do the same thing with Internet Explorer to kill Netscape?

Look at recent acquisitions of Google, Youtube. Now you require Google ID to watch videos on Youtube. You can't do it anonymously. Even blogger has succumbed to Google! Orkut also has Google ads. Google has also showing many technical glitches lately, especially with Orkut and Gmail.

Talking about another aspect of anonymity, Google keeps record of all or searches to "understand the users". So what you have searched, what are your preferences all is there with Google. If Google's shopping spree continues, I wonder if they will have all the record of our online lives. And Google has given this information to authorities in the past. In fact, there was a case, when a person was apprehended for his wife's murder, because he has searched terms related to murder. Some might claim that Google must help in such instances. But there is high chance of using personal information for wrong purposes.

Google has observed amazing succes over last few years because of its simplicity and innovative idea. The fact that Google has been competing with traditional bigwigs like Yahoo and Microsoft has created a sort of Googlemania, becuase people like underdogs. But I fear that Google itself is slowly becoming a next Microsoft. Google has to be beware of this.

PS: Check out this podcast about Google to get a peek at Googleplex.
http://www.thechangingworld.org/archives/wk40.php


PS: Just saw another problem with Google. Now you have to agree terms and conditions even while uploading photo on your own blog!

Labels: ,