Thursday, August 11, 2011

Two tiered test cricket?

Zimbabwe's return to test cricket was very impressive. Match was very competitive with both teams having good chance to win till 4th day. Two were almost evenly matched teams. Agreed that current England- India series is more one sided, but India had their chances and teams were more or less well matched on paper. Such matches are much more fun that one sided matches between top test teams and the cellar-dwellers like Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. With new football season about to begin this weekend, I wonder if similar structure could be applied to cricket as well to have more competitive matches and continued interest in test cricket. Two-tiered test cricket with promotion/ relegation could be the answer.

With 10 test teams, we can have 6 teams in top tier, viz., India, England, Australia, Sri Lanka, South Africa and Pakistan. And the rest, i.e., West Indies, New Zealand, Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, in 2nd tier. ICC is already proposing Test Championship. So why not have it among top 6 teams? And another tournament among second tier. (What prompted me to divide teams in these groups? I guess it's quite obvious. Zimbabwe are playing their next test against New Zealand, so this proves pedigree of the teams)

It would be run over 2 year period. During this period each team will play other team in test series (minimum 3 tests), either home or away. If one team plays at home against particular team, it plays away against same team in next tournament. Test series win would fetch 3 points and 1 for drawn series. Or we can have test wise scoring system as well. So at the end of 3 years the team with maximum points wins. No more complex calculations to decide world champion. After each tournament team at the bottom of the group relegates and team topping second tier would be promoted. So teams which are not good enough from top tier would automatically get relegated and teams like say New Zealand would get promoted.

So when would teams like New Zealand play against say India or Australia in that 2 year period? For that there could be knock-out tournament like FA Cup, which could run annually or biennially. 2 winners of knock-out matches in 2nd tier would join 6 teams in quarter finals. This would be based on random draws and so West Indies could be drawn against say England. This would be followed by Semis and Finals. Now this could be 2 or 3 test series. Effectively this gives even Bangladesh to compete and play with top teams in Semis and Finals provided they are good enough.

So in 2 year period, a test team would be playing 5 test series for the Championship and 2-3 test series for the Cup. Overall 7-8 test series in 2 year period, which is in sync with current schedules. But these series would be more competitive and should produce better cricket with everything to play for!

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Rise of BRICs in Sports

The tides are shifting! Both in global economy and in the sporting world. With most of the developed world still entrenched into stagnation, developing countries led by BRIC countries are leading the global growth parameters. And these very nations are set to break monopoly of the Western world in the sporting arena, at least in terms of their financial muscle.

Brazil has always been bottomless trove of footballing talent. Right from Pele to future star Neymar, Brazil has provided the world football with footballing stars. Not just European football, but even Indian league is littered with Brazilians. The flow of talent has always been from South America to Europe. Young talent in his teens would be spotted by European club scouts and he would be heading across Atlantic for greener pastures. Then at the dusk of his career, he would come back to his native land, showcasing his waning talent to his countrymen. But times are changing!

Corinthians have offered 40 million for Carlos Tevez. Brazilians are competing with top European clubs for Argentinian in his prime form, with a bid amount previously unheard of outside Europe. Many of the Brazilians are staying in Brazil longer (before they are poached by European clubs, of course) and return to Latin America in early 30s, when some of their talent is still intact. Ronaldinho recently returned to Brazil, whereas in earlier days he could have preferred to stay at 2nd rung European club. Brazilian clubs can match salaries offered by European clubs, because of booming economy.

And it's not just Brazil, Russians are also pouring money in football. Some unheard Russian club matched Real Madrid, Barcelona and Chelsea in bid for Neymar. Salaries at Russian clubs are at par with top European clubs (Arshevin's salary at St. Petersberg was matched by Arsenal IIRC). Fittingly Brazil and Russia are going to host next 2 football World Cups.

So would these growing economies eclipse European football, like Indian cricket did to England county cricket? IPL is drawing players from cricket's erstwhile leaders, England and Australia. English players are skipping county cricket to play in IPL, which would have been considered blasphemy a generation back. So would parochial English or Spanish players, who currently prefer not to go even outside their own country one day be playing in say Brazil? Would we see Santos or Sao Paolo poaching talent from Barcelona and Manchester United? Only time will tell. After all it's all about money, honey!

Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Test matches

ICC has recently announced its Futures Tours Program which gives overview of the cricketing tours and number of Test matches/ ODIs/ T20s till 2020. One of the thing which ICC could have avoided is 2 test series, as they often do not result in meaningful conclusion. With waning popularity of test cricket, meaningless series is last thing ICC could ask for.

Overall popularity of test cricket, especially crowds in stadiums, has been decreasing over last decade. Apart from England and Australia stadiums are hardly full for test matches, not even in 'cricket-crazy' India. So what could be possibly done to pump up the crowds in stadium? Few ideas based on last Cricinfo podcast and article I had read some time back (I couldn't find article :( )!

Most important sports these days are 'Events'. They are marketed and presented to the audience in nice package as something which would like to have as a part of lifestyle. Take example of EPL, which markets itself as best football league and as a great way to spend Saturday evening. Or tennis Grand Slams, which people aspire to go and watch. With busy lifestyles, it's important to have such sporting occasions on weekends/ holidays, when people can go and watch it. Football matches are played on weekends or at nights during weekdays. Grand Slams, F1, Tour de France are all arranged in European summer, the time when people usually take big vacation.

Even cricket matches in England and Australia are scheduled in summer time, when people can come and watch matches whole day. Test matches in early summer, in say May hardly draw any crowds. So its the occasion which people want to associate with! Boxing Day Test match at Melbourne or Lord's Test. Unfortunately, BCCI fails to create such aura about Test matches. People would flock stadiums if the sporting event is marketed properly. Take example of recently concluded World Cup. People were ready to pay anything just to soak the atmosphere in stadium. IPL which is held during holidays thrives on massive crowds in stadium.

While hosting any test match its imperative that there should be weekend in between. There have been instances in the past when BCCI had scheduled test matches which were between Monday and Friday. It's impossible to get good crowds for such matches. Ideally, as is the case in England, test matches should start on Thursdays.

Now about creating event around test matches. With many people taking holidays during Winter, it won't be very difficult task. Wouldn't it be great to have fixed test centres and dates coinciding with festivals or holidays. For example, how about having Pongal Test in Chennai every year or Republic Day test in Delhi or say Diwali test in Mumbai. If such 'events' are carefully nurtured, people could even think of including such test matches into their itinerary of trips during winter time, just like people plan their trips as per big tennis or football tournaments.

More importantly stadium facilities should be improved a lot. If people have to stay in the stadium for the entire day, it should be comfortable outing with friends and family rather than ordeal of 7 hours in scorching sun. Grass banks and barbecues would be welcome.

Problem is that BCCI takes Indian audience for granted and there is no effort to improve overall experience of cricket watching. I hope BCCI would make most of it's overflowing coffers for this purpose.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Fans & sports teams

Takeover saga at Liverpool is over, but their on-the-field performance remains the same. Mired into relegation, avoiding bottom of the league just by goal difference. Fans have not only passionately followed the events both on and off the field, but also tried to influence the proceedings by protests, campaigns n all. That's how fans all over the world follow their teams, especially in football.

Now consider another news over the last week. 2 franchises dropped from IPL, Rajasthan & Punjab! It was any-ways a disputed decision, showing how whimsical BCCI n IPL authorities are. But 'fans' of these franchises have been conspicuously absent from these events. The very people who pack stadiums during IPL are not at all bothered about fate of their city-teams.

This again shows how flimsy the fan-following for IPL is. Of course, it is great source of entertainment and that's what it is. Only entertainment. Football clubs are part of the social milieu, communities associate with them. That's why fate of Liverpool football club binds all people of Liverpool. 40000 people flock Ellan Road even when Leeds are in League 1. It's because people associate with the club. Sadly IPL still hasn't developed such passions. I hope in India, there would be such sport culture one day, but I don't see IPL being solution for that. To have such passions, you need bottom up approach!

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Sports & subcontinent

Last 2 weeks have been amazing for sport lovers in India. Commonwealth games and India-Australia Test series. Both provided enthralling contest and tight finishes. I really enjoyed see-saw battle for 2nd place in medals table between India & England. Hope some of this success translates into Olympic medals.

Talking about medals table, bbc provided two interesting tables along with normal table. It showed population per medal & GDP per medal. India of course was very much at the bottom in both these tables, in spite of healthy medals tally and it was expected. We always lament about India's inability to get medals in spite of huge population. (Indian story has always been about volumes game n never per capita, especially in economy. But that's different story.)

So coming back to the medals table by population & GDP, 4 out of bottom 5 countries in both tables are India, Bangladesh, Pakistan & Sri Lanka. All south asian countries. Bangladesh is at bottom in both these tables with just 1 bronze medal with population of 160 million, 1/6th of India. Still they have managed just 1 bronze. Pakistan another country from subcontinent has won 5 medals, with 2 golds. What's the thing with south asian countries that they are unable to win medals in sporting competition? They are richer than African countries which regularly win medals, if that is an excuse. They are physically similar to Chinese, Koreans if physique is to be excuse. So where lies the problem? Is it just that sport is not part of culture in subcontinent? Question to ponder about!

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Things are not always black & white

Though about writing some random stuff on blog after long time. This may be written out of my passion for European sports.

IPL also has this tie-breaker 1-over thing when match is tied, on the lines of American sports. I wonder why there should be some decider to get ultimate winner. Why can't we accept that two teams were matched throughout the match, say based on skills, so that the contest resulted in draw.

That's what happens in football leagues. You often hear the expressions like- Teams were so very well matched that draw is fair result, Our team played well & we deserved a point, if not 3. So the point system provides opportunity for teams to be matched & at the same time discourages draws by giving 2 teams 1 points instead of 3 for winning. Of course there are instances where decision has to be made, when penalty shootouts are introduced. But those are exceptional Cup competitions n normal service resumes in League games. So for most part of season, there is fair opportunities for teams to be matched.

Is there any compulsion that matches have to be decided one way or the other? Things are always not black & white! Neither in sports, nor in life!

Labels: , ,